United States v. Neufeld-Neufeld
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Enrique Neufeld-Neufeld (“Neufeld”) asserts on appeal that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized following an al~ legedly unlawful vehicle stop. We AFFIRM.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Around noon on May 18, 2001, Border Patrol Agents Rodolfo Garcia (“Garcia”) 1 and David Marshall (“Marshall”) 2 (collectively, “the Agents”) were traveling south on U.S. Highway 385 through Big Bend National Park (“Big Bend”). 3 The Agents were driving separate vehicles — Garcia in front in an unmarked vehicle and Marshall a quarter-mile behind in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. JaquezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Quintana-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Luis CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Carlos Gonzalez v. Able HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.