Legal Opinion
In re Gembarosky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 29, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*210OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on February 16, 1982 and formerly maintained an office in Buffalo. On December 23, 1994, respondent was suspended from practice pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.19 (f) (2) (i) (a) based upon his failure to respond to a judicial subpoena directing him to appear and answer a complaint (Matter of Gembarosky, 207 AD2d 75). Additionally, on February 3, 1995, respondent was suspended for six months and until further order of the Court for the commission of other misconduct (Matter of Gembarosky, 208 AD2d 118).
The Grievance…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- In re SupplesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re SchweitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re GembaroskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re GembaroskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
4Cited by2 opinions
- In re MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re HetzeltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996