In re Gembarosky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court on *76February 16, 1982. The Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District has filed a motion pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.19 (f) to suspend respondent from the practice of law pending the determination of nine disciplinary charges, asserting that respondent is guilty of misconduct immediately threatening the public interest and that respondent failed to respond to a judicial subpoena directing him to appear and answer a complaint.
The complaint alleges that respondent’s client delivered to respondent funds to be held in…
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re GembaroskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995