Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1971No. Civ. 37337PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALARCON, J. *

The People seek a writ of mandate to require the respondent Superior Court of Los Angeles County to vacate its order of September 11, 1970, granting the motion of the real party in interest (hereinafter referred to as defendant) to suppress a watch seized at the time of booking.

Factual Background

Only one witness testified at the evidentiary hearing pursuant to section 1538.5, subdivision (i). The evidence relevant to the problem we must resolve may be summarized as follows:

Richard Hodges, a police officer in the City of Signal Hill, was on duty in a marked police vehicle…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Agar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. People v. GilliamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. People v. McKelvyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API