Legal Opinion

Heinsimer v. Wellington Leisure Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 11, 1998No. A98A0132PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge.

This case arises from a complex agreement entered into between Wellington Leisure Products, Inc. (“Wellington”), Peter Heinsimer and Daniel Estreich. The record shows that in 1982, Wellington, Heinsimer and Estreich entered into an agreement whereby Heinsimer and Estreich were to market and sell craft products manufactured by Wellington. The proceeds of the sale of the craft products were collected by a company called Maxwell International of Delaware, Inc. (“Maxwell”), which was owned 50 percent by Wellington and 25 percent each by Heinsimer and Estreich. After paying certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Green v. SamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Beeson v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dildine v. Town & Country Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Harper v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Travelers Insurance v. LinnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API