Legal Opinion
Dildine v. Town & Country Truck Sales, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 18, 2003No. A02A2419PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Presiding Judge.
Seeking damages pursuant to the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, Laura Dildine sued Town & Country Truck Sales, Inc. (“Town & Country”) for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability associated with a car she purchased from the dealership. Dildine also sought to revoke acceptance of the vehicle. After Dildine presented her case to the jury, the trial court directed a verdict for Town & Country. Dildine appeals, and for reasons that follow, we affirm.
1. “ A directed verdict is proper only if there is no conflict in the evidence as to any material issue and the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pfeiffer v. Georgia Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Freeman v. Hubco Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Cannon v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Andean Motor Company v. MulkeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Fedrick v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
- Knight v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- McDonald v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Monticello v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
- Mitchell v. BACKUS CADILLAC-PONTIAC, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.