Legal Opinion

Pittman v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1922No. 4 Div. 681PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The indictment was in Code form. The demurrers thereto were properly overruled. Thomas v. State, 166 Ala. 40, 52 South. 34.

The original prosecution was begun in the justice of the peace court, and was for the offense denounced by section 6232, Code 1907 — cruelty to animals. Of this offense the justice of the peace had jurisdiction. Code 1907, § 6733.

The record shows that on the 14th day of April 1919, the defendant was in dute form arraigned on said charge in the justice court of John A. May, and before entering upon the trial of this case demanded a trial by jury; that said demand for trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wiley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  2. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Ex parte DunklinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bringhurst v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Anderton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  4. Toomer v. Van Antwerp Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Hamlett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API