Legal Opinion

Leominster Materials Corp. v. Town of Lancaster

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 20, 2002No. 01-P-187Published

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfer, J.

Leominster Materials Corporation (LMC) proposed to build a bituminous concrete (asphalt) plant and stone crushing facility on the land it leased in the town of Lancaster (town). The board of health of the town (board), by a letter to LMC dated July 10, 1997, determined that the activity proposed by LMC “may be a ‘noisome trade’[1] as that term is *821used in G. L. c. Ill, § 143.”2 It further ordered: “Therefore, the Board of Health requires that you submit a site assignment application to the Board prior to constructing or operating the proposed plant. Thereafter, the Board will conduct a public…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Carnation Co. v. Pacific Westbound ConferenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. East Chop Tennis Club v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. United States v. Michigan National Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Assuncao's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API