Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 15, 1992No. 91-180PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Defendant, Angela Thompson, appeals from a $500 fine, imposed after she was convicted of simple assault. She claims the sentence violated her due process rights because it was imposed after she asserted her right to appeal from a proposed lower sentence which contained illegal elements. We agree and reverse.

Defendant was convicted of simple assault entered into by mutual consent following a fight with another woman. 13 V.S.A. § 1023(b). At the sentencing hearing, the court first proposed a $500 fine with all but $100 suspended and ordered the defendant to pay $200 in restitution. When…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Colburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. State v. PercySupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Mahoney v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. State v. KenvinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. State v. KenvinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. State v. RangelOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API