Kelly v. Tiner
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Klugh, j., Darlington, October, 1909. Action by Elias Kelly and Burrell J. Kelly against John Tiner. From Circuit order refusing motion to dissolve temporary injunction, defendant appeals. cite: Judge could have vacated the injunction: 246, Code Proc.; 69 S. C., 159, 52; 27 S. C., 415; 33 S. C., 410; and he should have done so: 16 Eney., 431. Indictment is proper remedy: 81 S. C., 370; 1 Hill, 367; 5 Rich., 590; 30 S. C., 646; 46 S. C., 336; 48 S. C., 560; .49 S. C.,…
Read the full summary
Before Klugh, j., Darlington, October, 1909. Action by Elias Kelly and Burrell J. Kelly against John Tiner. From Circuit order refusing motion to dissolve temporary injunction, defendant appeals. cite: Judge could have vacated the injunction: 246, Code Proc.; 69 S. C., 159, 52; 27 S. C., 415; 33 S. C., 410; and he should have done so: 16 Eney., 431. Indictment is proper remedy: 81 S. C., 370; 1 Hill, 367; 5 Rich., 590; 30 S. C., 646; 46 S. C., 336; 48 S. C., 560; .49 S. C., 130; 54 S. C., 250; 83 S. C., 292; 80 S. C., 515; 3 S. C., 438. Equity will not grant relief in such case: 3 L. R. A.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
This is an appeal from an order refusing to dissolve a temporary injunction.
The question raised by the exceptions, upon which the others are dependent, is, whether his Honor, the Circuit Judge, erred in ruling, that under the case of Cudd v. Calvert, 54 S. C., 457, 32 S. E., 503, he was without authority to entertain the motion to dissolve the injunction. In the case of Cudd v. Calvert, 54 S. C., 457, 32 S. E., 503, upon which the Circuit Judge based his ruling, the Court uses this language: “It seems to us that where, as in this case,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alderman & Sons Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- Marion County Lumber Co. v. Tilghman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- Cudd v. CalvertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bookhart v. Central Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Twin City Power Co. v. Savannah River Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Marion County Lumber Co. v. HodgesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- Ex parte JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.