Legal Opinion

Alderman & Sons Co. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 10, 1904PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Before .Purdy, J., Florence, August, 1903. Action by D. W. Alderman & Sons Co. against Thomas - Wilson. From order granting temporary injunction, defendant appeals. cite: As to when the equity for an injunction attaches: Adam’s Eq., 497; 17 S. C., 411; Rice Ch., 80; High on Inj., secs. 4, 7, 9, 10, 13, 15; 1 Dill. C. C., 469. Complaint does not state a case warrant-' ing equitable interference: High on Inj., secs. 35, 37; Wood.

Read the full summary

Before .Purdy, J., Florence, August, 1903. Action by D. W. Alderman & Sons Co. against Thomas - Wilson. From order granting temporary injunction, defendant appeals. cite: As to when the equity for an injunction attaches: Adam’s Eq., 497; 17 S. C., 411; Rice Ch., 80; High on Inj., secs. 4, 7, 9, 10, 13, 15; 1 Dill. C. C., 469. Complaint does not state a case warrant-' ing equitable interference: High on Inj., secs. 35, 37; Wood. L. & T., sec. 227; 17 S. C., 411; Hellams v. Szmtser, 24 S. C.; Threait v. Brewer Co42 S. C.; Alston v. Limehouse, 60 S. C.; Lipscomb v. Littlejohn, 63 S. C. cite: As…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones

This is an appeal from an order of temporary injunction pendente lite, granted herein by Judge Purdy, August 18, 1903, restraining defendant from building or operating a railroad upon or across that part of the land described in the complaint, on which plaintiff has located its right of way, alleged in the complaint to be exclusive and prior to any right of defendant.

In his order granting the injunction, Judge Purdy said: “Under the law as I conceive it to be, if complaint shows a prima facie case for equitable interference, it is the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alston v. LimehouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  2. Ragsdale v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  3. Cudd v. CalvertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  4. Darlington Oil Co. v. Pee Dee Oil & Ice Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  5. Seabrook v. MostowitzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Childs v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. Bookhart v. Central Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  3. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. PorterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  4. Marion County Lumber Co. v. Tilghman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  5. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Custom Recording Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API