Legal Opinion

Ex parte Anderson

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1917PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Habeas corpus by Ballard L. Anderson.

1Opinion of the Court

POEEENBARGER, JUDGE :

Having been put upon trial on an indictment for malicious wounding over his protest and claim of right to a discharge from prosecution, for the failure of the state to give him a speedy trial, found guilty of unlawful cutting and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a period of one year, Ballard L. Anderson seeks his liberation from custody.

In advance of the trial, he moved for his discharge, and, on that motion, set forth the grounds upon which he relied. This motion having been overruled, he tendered a plea in writing, setting up the same facts, to which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. In Re SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Coal & Coke Ry. Co. v. ConleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Reeves v. RossWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smith v. DeBerryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. CrawfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Ex parte BraceyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State v. UnderwoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State Ex Rel. Farley v. KramerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API