Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Thurman

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1985PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Justice.

Respondent was found guilty of first-degree peijury pursuant to K.R.S. 523.020 and K.R.S. 523.050(1) and (2). K.R.S. 523.-020(1) provides:

“A person is guilty of perjury in the first degree when he makes a material false statement, which he does not believe, in any official proceeding under an oath required or authorized by law....”

K.R.S. 523.050 provides:

“(1) When a person has made inconsistent statements under oath, both having been made within the period of the statute of limitations, the prosecution may proceed by setting forth the inconsistent statements in a single charge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fugate v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  2. Hopper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
  3. Al May v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chestnut v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. DukeKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. CollinsKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Caldwell v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Holbrooks v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API