Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Thurman
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 1985PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANCE, Justice.
Respondent was found guilty of first-degree peijury pursuant to K.R.S. 523.020 and K.R.S. 523.050(1) and (2). K.R.S. 523.-020(1) provides:
“A person is guilty of perjury in the first degree when he makes a material false statement, which he does not believe, in any official proceeding under an oath required or authorized by law....”
K.R.S. 523.050 provides:
“(1) When a person has made inconsistent statements under oath, both having been made within the period of the statute of limitations, the prosecution may proceed by setting forth the inconsistent statements in a single charge…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fugate v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Hopper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
- Al May v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chestnut v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
- Commonwealth v. DukeKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
- Commonwealth v. CollinsKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Caldwell v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Holbrooks v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.