Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ethyl Corp.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 21, 1976No. Civ. A. 74-H-878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

CARL O. BUE, Jr., District Judge.

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

A. Plaintiff’s Injury

1. Plaintiff injured his back on or about March 21, 1970. An employee of defendant with eighteen years seniority, plaintiff had previously injured his back in a work-related incident in 1965, and he was familiar with the procedures to be followed in reporting an injury and in applying for compensation claims.

2. Plaintiff was examined on or about March 21, 1970, by the company physician, Dr. Burdick, and after receiving heat treatment he was sent home. He returned to work the next…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Richardson v. BelcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. C & C Plywood Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Houston Pipe Line Company v. DwyerTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. William O. Haughton, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Blackships, Inc., Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richard A. Kananen v. David Matthews, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. Bonar v. Barnett Bank of Jacksonville, N.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1980
  3. Barnett v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API