New York Life Insurance v. Veit
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.
In 1923 Minnie A. Bradbrook applied to plaintiff for, and there was issued to her by plaintiff, a policy of insurance on her life, payable to her husband, George E. Brad-brook, in the face amount of $25,000. The written application signed by Mrs. Bradbrook stated that she had been born in 1877, and that she was forty-six years old at the time she applied. Her application contained language assuring plaintiff that all the answers therein were true and that she understood that plaintiff would believe them to be true and act upon them. So acting, plaintiff wrote the policy at the premium rate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of Met. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Apter v. Home Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- National Life Ins. Co. v. . MinchNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Matter of Kaplan v. PeyserNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Mutual Life Insurance v. WagerNew York Supreme Court · 1858
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. ShallowayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. DanielsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Amica Life Insurance v. BarborDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951