Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Hollender

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1951No. L. A. 21561Published

1Opinion of the Court

38 Cal.2d 73 (1951)

237 P.2d 510

NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,

v.

LEO HOLLENDER, Respondent.

Docket No. L.A. 21561.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

November 21, 1951.

Meserve, Mumper & Hughes and C. Avery Crary for Appellant.

Newlin, Holley, Sandmeyer & Tackabury, Keesling & Keesling, Henry H. Childress, George W. Tackabury and Hudson B. Cox, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Appellant.

Leo M. Zinner, Walley & Davis and Milton Davis for Respondent.

SPENCE, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to reform an insurance policy issued on the life of defendant Leo Hollender. Specifically, it sought a…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Matter of Met. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Clement v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  3. New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Burr v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API