Legal Opinion
"Ketcham" v. "Ketcham"
New York Family Court
Decided June 20, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSicher, J.
Petition has been filed by a father, upwards of sixty-five years of age, alleging destitution and asking support contributions from five children, all of them now adults and bona fide. residents of the State of New Jersey.
Neither respondent Marguerite K. “ Flannigan ” nor respondent Florence “ Ketcham ” has been served with process nor found within the State of New York, and those two are, therefore, not yet subject to mandate of this court.
However, the other three respondents, Adelaide “ Ketcham,” William B. “ Ketcham,” Jr., and Gerard “ Ketcham,” were personally served with summons within…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erkenbrach v. . ErkenbrachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Worthington v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- American Historical Society, Inc. v. GlennNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Matter of Kane v. NecciNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Goetting v. . NormoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atkins v. CurtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Radich v. KrulyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- "Vincenza" v. "Vincenza"New York Family Court · 1950
- Hodges v. HodgesNew York Family Court · 1951
- Lister v. SheridanNew York Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.