Legal Opinion

State v. Catalino

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1922No. 16959PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered May 9, 1921, upon a trial and conviction of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor.

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

— The appellant was convicted in the justice court, and subsequently, on appeal, in the superior court, on a complaint which charged that he “had in his possession intoxicating liquor other than alcohol.” On the trial, the state introduced evidence that the appellant’s dwelling had been entered and evidence obtained under a search warrant, which was introduced in evidence. The court denied the appellant the right to cross-examine the witness as to the validity of the search warrant.

Noticing this last claim of error first, we are inclined to believe that the court should have permitted the *612cros…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CareyWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. State v. BodeckarWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State v. KoernerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State v. MullerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. RoyseWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In Re HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. State v. MisetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State v. NewsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. State v. WhippleWashington Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API