Legal Opinion

Teter v. Clemens

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 8, 1985No. 84-254PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reinhard

Plaintiff, Brian Teter, appeals from the dismissal of his amended complaint upon the motion to dismiss (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 110, par. 2 — 615) of defendants, Orville and Betty Clemens. Plaintiff, age five at the time of the occurrence, stated in his complaint that he sustained injury resulting from being struck in the eye with a pellet which had been fired from a pellet pump pistol by the defendants’ five-year-old grandson who had come into possession of that pistol from a place alleged to be accessible to the reach of the grandson on defendants’ premises.

The issues presented on appeal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kahn v. James Burton Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Pelham v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Lance v. SeniorIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Collier v. Wagner Castings Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Curtis v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Teter v. ClemensIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Berkeley Pump Co. v. Reed-Joseph Land Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Ransom v. City of Garden CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Miller v. Civil Constructors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Borgsmiller v. BurroughsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API