Legal Opinion
In Re Neilsen
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided February 7, 2011No. 10-50124PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ROSS W. KRUMM, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court for consideration is the Motion to Reconsider and/or Rule for the First Time on the Motion for Relief From Stay filed by Robert M. Harris (hereafter the “Movant”), filed on January 28, 2011. 1 The Court finds that the Motion to Reconsider and/or Rule for the First Time on the Motion for Relief From Stay is actually two separate motions, the first is a motion to reconsider a prior order of the Court (hereafter the “Motion to Reconsider”) and the second is a motion for relief from the automatic stay (hereafter the “Motion for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. CalifanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
- United States v. James W. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Holsey v. BassDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981
- In Re William L. Embry, Debtor. Boatmen's Bank of Tennessee v. William L. EmbryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Watson v. City National Bank (In Re Watson)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re TuckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2014
- In re TuckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015
- Witzke v. RieckDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022