Legal Opinion

Estate of Metcalf v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided August 6, 1928No. Docket No. 13348PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*237OPINION.

Akundell :

In 1921 the Southern Pacific Co. was the owner of all the capital stock of the Pacific Oil Co. In that year it paid a dividend in the form of a right to purchase stock of the Pacific Oil Co. at the price of $15 per share, which right had a fair market value on the date of its receipt of $18 per share. The value of the rights received by the petitioner should have been returned as an ordinary dividend taxable only at surtax rates. Peabody v. Eisner, 247 U. S. 347. The subsequent sale or other disposition of the property received by way of a dividend would give rise to gain or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. PhellisSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Lynch v. HornbySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Miles v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Peabody v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ward v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  2. Metcalf v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  3. Timken v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API