Legal Opinion

State v. Romero

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1980No. 3895PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDREWS, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of criminal sexual penetration (CSP) in the second degree in violation of § 30-9-ll(B), N.M.S.A.1978, and appeals, raising four issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in refusing to dismiss the indictment under which he was convicted in view of the fact that another indictment charging the same offense had been issued earlier; (2) whether the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the elements of the lesser included offense of CSP in the third degree; (3) whether the trial court erred in refusing to allow the prosecuting witness…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. HerreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State v. DehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Olguin v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. VigilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. FishNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Demers v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. State v. DabkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. State v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. State v. HernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API