Heckert v. Haine
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
in ERROR. T'HIS was a writ of error to the Common Pleas of Dauphin county, whex-e three bills of exceptions were tendered by the counsel of the plaintiffs in error, who were defendants below, to the opinion of the Court, in admitting and overruling testimony. The whole case appears in the opinion of the Chief Justice.
1Opinion of the Court
Tilghman C. J.
This action was brought by George -^a^ne the plaintiff below against John Heckert the original defendant below, who had been his guardian, for money received by the defendant for the use of the plaintiff during j^jg minority. The action was commenced in 1787, Heckert J t ... 7 died in 1799, and on his death his admixxistrators became parties to the suit. Three bills of exceptions were taken in thte course of the trial, .. The plaintiff offered to prove by the oath of John Haine, that the said. Haine had paid to J. Heckert as guardian of Plaintiff the suxnof 150/. specie in the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Babb v. ClemsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1824
- Humphries v. McCrawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1843
- Brynjolfson v. Northwestern Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Ryerss v. Trustees of the Presbyterian CongregationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Bullions ex rel. Swan & Clifford v. Loring Bros.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1856
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.