Legal Opinion
Xedit Corp. v. Harvel Industries Corp., Fidelipac
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 21, 1978No. 78 Civ. 320 (MEF)PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
FRANKEL, District Judge.
This action was commenced by Xedit Corporation against Harvel Industries Corp., Fidelipac, 1 a division of Harvel, and David McCloskey, general manager of Fidelipac, for unlawful misappropriation of trade secrets and unjust enrichment. Defendants have moved to dismiss on the ground that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over them.
I
Xedit is a New York corporation. Defendant Harvel is a New Jersey corporation having its principal place of business in Wheeling, Illinois. Defendant Fidelipac is a New Jersey based product division of Harvel in the business of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Parke-Bernet Galleries, Inc. v. FranklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Lehigh Valley Industries, Inc., and Lehigh Colonial Corporation, Vsv. Norman Birenbaum, and David BirenbaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- American Eutectic Welding Alloys Sales Co. v. Dytron Alloys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- David Neiman D/B/A London Group (1974) v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., Ltd., James Gourlay and Ingleram Investments, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Beatie and Osborn LLP v. Patriot Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- International Customs Associates, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Bross Utilities Service Corp. v. AboubshaitDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Interface Biomedical Laboratories Corp. v. Axiom Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.