Legal Opinion

Balter v. Webner

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided September 30, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdlerman, J.

Plaintiff brought an action to recover damages for persona] injuries arising out of an automobile accident. An automobile owned and operated by C. Fred Webner, a New Jersey resident, and an automobile owned and operated by one Maidenbaum, collided near Middletown, N. Y. Plaintiffs were riding in the Maidenbaum car. Jurisdiction of Mr. Webner, the non-resident *185operator and owner of said automobile, was obtained pursuant to section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law of this State by serving the Secretary of State, and forwarding copy of summons and complaint by registered mail to Mr. Webner.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Helme v. . BuckelewNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Hopper v. . HopperNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Vecchione v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Rogers v. GouldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. Rogers v. GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Knoop v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1947
  2. Barrett v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  3. Kohler v. DerderianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  4. Fazio ex rel. Fazio v. American Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1955
  5. Neiman-Marcus Co. v. LaitDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API