Legal Opinion
Barrett v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 9, 1986No. 76 Civ. 1061 (CBM)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTLEY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff has moved to substitute the Estate of Harris J. North, for defendant Harris J. North, deceased. Plaintiff’s motion is granted for the following reasons. DISCUSSION
Harris J. North died on February 11, 1985. He resided in Virginia. Rule 25(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that:
[ijf a party dies and the claim is not thereby extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper parties. The motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the successors or representatives of the deceased party and, together with the notice of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hattie Brazier v. W. B. CherryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Barrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Rosenfeld v. Hotel Corp. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Javits v. StevensDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Duchesne v. SugarmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grandbouche v. ClancyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Graham v. HendersonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- Barrett v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Blissett v. EisensmidtDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Grandbouche v. ClancyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.