Legal Opinion

Ausman ex rel. Estate of Ausman v. Hiram Shaddox Geriatric Center

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 21, 2013No. 12-183PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALD L. CORBIN, Justice.

|! Appellant Diane Koniecki Ausman, on behalf of the Estate of Daniel Herman Ausman, deceased (the Estate), appeals the order of the Baxter County Circuit Court dismissing with prejudice its complaint against Appellee Hiram Shaddox Geriatric Center. On appeal, the Estate argues that it was error to dismiss its complaint because Ark. R. Civ. P. 25 (2012) simply required an administrator to be substituted within ninety days after a death is suggested upon the record. As this case presents an issue of first impression, our jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. Sup.Ct. R. 1 —…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Central Oklahoma Pipeline, Inc. v. Hawk Field Services, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Forrest Construction, Inc. v. MilamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Boellner v. Clinical Study Centers, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Scoggins v. MedlockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Deaver v. Faucon Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alltel Corp. v. RosenowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Garrett v. Progressive Eldercare Servs. Saline, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Taylor v. MCSA LLC.2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Motley v. SiffordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API