Legal Opinion

Raineri v. Hills. Cty. Correct.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided January 9, 1996No. CV-93-118-JDPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Raineri v . Hills. Cty. Correct. CV-93-118-JD 01/09/96 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Bruce T . Raineri v. Civil N o . 93-118-JD Director, Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, et a l . O R D E R The pro se plaintiff, Bruce Raineri, brought this action under

42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 against the Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, its superintendent, and various other employees. Before the court are the motion to dismiss of Superintendent O'Mara (document n o . 5 1 ) , the motion for summary judgment of Officers Vacca and Dyer (document n…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Desiderio Cartagena and Domingo Alvarez, Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Pedro N. Soto and Edwin F. GotayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API