Legal Opinion

Clarence Williams v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 16, 1970No. 28850PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

In this pro se case appellant has failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, F.R.A.P., and has requested that the case be disposed of summarily pursuant to Rule 9(c) (2) of this Court. Stout v. Broom, 5 Cir. 1969, 406 F.2d 758. The district court denied appellant’s motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We affirm.

Clarence Williams was convicted on his plea of guilty on two counts of possession of stolen mail, violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1708. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of four years on each count. On that same day, however, before appellant had left the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nathaniel Vincent v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  2. Walton v. United States (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  3. United States v. John Daniel ByarsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  4. De Maggio v. CoxeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  5. Lloyd Stout v. Sheriff, George A. BroomCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael M. Busic, United States of America v. Anthony LaroccaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. Dorothy JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Carl P. FogelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Kenneth James LundienCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API