Legal Opinion
Arellano v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 21, 2003No. 3:02-cv-02207PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND
ORDER DENYING REQUESTS FOR SANCTIONS
JONES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs motion to remand. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion is DENIED. In addition, both parties’ requests for sanctions are DENIED.
BACKGROUND
On January 22, 2002, plaintiff Oscar Ar-ellano, an employee of defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (“Home Depot”), urinated in the bushes behind the Home Depot store. Arellano was observed by a coworker, who reported the incident to management. The next day, Arellano provided Home Depot management…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Mike Cohn, D.V.M. v. Petsmart, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Industrial Tectonics, Inc. v. Aero Alloy, a California Corporation Die Cast Products, Inc., a California Corporation, AKA Metal Products GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Tosco Corp. v. Communities for a Better EnvironmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Jacqueline E. Michalski v. The Home Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Korn v. Polo Ralph Lauren Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2008
- McGlynn v. HustonDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2010
- Albino v. Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
- Lao v. Wickes Furniture Co., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
- State Auto Financial Acquisition Corp. v. STATE AUTO. MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.