In re the Arbitration between Tuttman & Kattan, Talamas Export Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The contract between the parties provided: “ Any controversy arising under, or in relation to this contract shall be settled by arbitration.” In another clause of the contract it was agreed that “ All claims are to be made within 10 days of receipt of goods, and no claims or allowances can be made after the goods is [sic] cut or converted.” About twenty-seven days after the goods had been delivered by respondent to petitioners, the latter claimed to have discovered them to be defective and attempted to return the merchandise. The material had never been used, cut or converted by petitioners.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- S. A. Wenger & Co. v. Propper Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Raphael & SilberbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
- In re the Arbitration between Central School District No. 2 & Livingston Manor Teachers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Napa Ass'n of Public Employees v. County of NapaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Gera Fabrics Division, Peter Fuller Enterprises, Inc. v. Liberty Fabrics of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Board of Education v. Luna Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.