Legal Opinion

Allred v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1889PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Circuit Court of Dale. Tried before the Hon. Jesse M; Carmichael.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.

The appellant was convicted under an indictment which charged him with engaging in, or carrying on, the business of retailing spirituous, vinous or malt liquors, or intoxicating hitters, without a license. The evidence went to show that he engaged in and carried on the business of selling a compound called “Busby’s Bitters,” which he sold in quantities less than a quart. The evidence also tended to show that this bitters was an intoxicating liquor, and was purchased from defendant to be used, and *113was used, as a beverage. It was not shown what ingredients entered into the composition of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Horton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Adler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. State v. . GierschSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Wall v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. State v. OliverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Carroll v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Marks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Daniel v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Espey v. Convenience MarketersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Tinker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API