Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Biagini

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1931No. 1706PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RiNer, Justice.

This is a proceeding by direct appeal from a judgment confirming the report of commissioners in eminent domain proceedings prosecuted in the District Court of Big Horn County, Wyoming. The procedure in the case in that court was undertaken pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 316, W. C. S. 1920, and was instituted by G-. Ralph Hoover, for whom Lucy R. Hoover, his wife, was, by stipulation of the parties, thereafter substituted. The appellant, Louis Bia-gini, will hereinafter be designated as the defendant, as in the court below, and the adverse party as the petitioner.

On March…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. MercurSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Wyoming Railway Co. v. LeiterWyoming Supreme Court · 1917
  3. St. Clair Borough v. SouilierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  5. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co. v. EubanksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Doe v. Elson S Floyd College of Medicine at Washington State UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API