Legal Opinion

Holt v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1931No. 4 Div. 696PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

There is no bill of exceptions in this ease, the' appeal is predicated upon the record proper, and counsel for appellant presents two propositions, insisting upon a reversal on each point of decision thus presented.

In the lower court appellant was convicted for the offense of violating the state prohibition law. The trial was had upon an indictment preferred by the grand jury.

It is first insisted that “the conviction in this ease should not be sustained and the judgment of conviction should be reversed because the indictment does not show in what county or..in what court said.indictment was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Overton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. Maloy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Jarnigan v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leach v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Austin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Holt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Meek v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API