Maloy v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.
It is first insisted by appellant that the indictment is void and will not support a conviction for the reason that the caption of the indictment does not meet the requirements of section 4526 of the Code of 1923. To sustain this contention our attention is directed to the indictment appearing in the record, which begins: “Enterprise Jurisdiction *■ * * Spring term 1929.” This is not the caption of the indictment, within the meaning of the statute, but a marginal entry, not at all necessary to its validity. The caption of an indictment is the entry of record showing when and where the court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Owens v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Goodloe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Daugherty v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
- McDaniel v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
- Jacobs v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
- McGee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.