Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

The Mary Ethel

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 9, 1923PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

These are suits in admiralty and were tried together. The first above entitled suit was to recover damages caused to the barge Thomas Bulger by collision when she went adrift by reason of the alleged negligence of the respondents. The second above entitled suit was to recover damages caused to the winch' boat Dutch Boy, owned by the National Lead Company (the Home Insurance Company claiming by virtue of an alleged assignment from the National Lead Company) by collision when she went adrift by reason of the alleged negligence of the respondents and respondents…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dailey v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  2. McWilliams Bros. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. Pennsylvania R. v. James McWilliams Towing LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  4. The William Guinan HowardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  5. The WillieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. The Anna O'BoyleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. Hebert v. Barge ABL-22District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963
  3. Empire-Park Square Lumber Company, Libellant-Appellee v. Manhattan Lighterage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  4. New York Trap Rock Corp. v. Cornell Steamboat Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
  5. The No. 302District Court, S.D. New York · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API