Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Appeal of Shaw

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 7, 2008No. 06-463PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurkin, J.

¶ 1. March 7, 2008. Several nearby landowners (neighbors) appeal the Environmental Court’s decision granting Rinkers Communication’s application for conditional-use approval to build a telecommunications tower in Hardwick, Vermont. Neighbors contend on appeal that the Environmental Court erred by: (1) concluding that the proposed tower would not have an undue adverse effect on scenic resources; and (2) concluding that there were no alternative sites for the tower. We affirm.

¶2. The Environmental Court found the following facts after a site visit and two days of hearings. Rinkers proposed to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kalakowski v. John A. Russell Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  2. In Re Appeal of Bennington School, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  3. In Re Appeal of MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  4. In re Appeal of BeckstromSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. In re Appeal of Wesco, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Rinkers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. In Re Katzenbach A250 Permit 7R1374-1 (Christian Katzenbach & Clark Katzenbach, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2022
  3. State v. Devan CalabreseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  4. In Re Appeal of LiCausiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  5. Rinker's d/b/a Rinker's Comm. & ShephardVermont Superior Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API