In Re Rinkers, Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. The question this ease presents is whether a 180-foot telecommunications tower in the town of Hardwick would have an undue adverse effect on the aesthetics of the area in violation of Criterion 8 of Act 250. Neighboring landowners appeal the issuance of an Act 250 land-use permit for the project. Specifically, they contest (1) whether the project violates a clear, written community standard intended to preserve the aesthetics of the area, and (2) whether a reduction of the tower’s height is a mitigating step that the developer should have taken to improve the harmony of the project with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Eastview at Middlebury, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- In re Stokes Communications Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- In Re Appeal of ShawSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
3Cited by22 opinions
- In re Chaves A250 Permit ReconsiderSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In re Petition of Apple Hill Solar LLC (Libby Harris and Apple Hill Homeowners Association, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- In re Goddard College Conditional Use, Goddard College Act 250 ReconsiderationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Regan v. Pomerleau, DeForest Realty, Inc. and City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In re North East Materials Group LLC ACT 250 JO 5-21 (Russell Austin, Pamela Austin, Julie Barre, Marc Bernier, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.