Legal Opinion

Charles L. Perdue, Jr. v. Sears, Roebuck and Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 29, 1982No. 81-2035PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIDENER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff, as administrator for the estate of his son, Kevin Barry Perdue, brought this diversity action in the district court alleging that the Sears tires on the Cherry vehicle at the time of the accident in question contributed to his decedent’s death. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant on the basis of a release given by the plaintiff to the defendant’s alleged joint tortfeasor. Perdue v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 523 F.Supp. 203 (W.D.Va.1981). Plaintiff appealed, asserting that the district court misinterpreted the applicable Virginia statute.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wright v. OrlowskiSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  2. Shortt v. Hudson Supply & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  3. Lackey v. Brooks, Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  4. Perdue v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. John A. Jones v. General Motors Corporation v. Pamela Lynn Brown, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. R & D 2001, LLC v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Hayman v. Patio Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  4. Cauthorn v. British Leyland, UK, Ltd.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  5. Auer v. Kawasaki Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API