Legal Opinion

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish his constructive possession of the contraband seized from an apartment upon the execution of a search warrant. We disagree. We conclude that the evidence adduced at trial satisfies the requisite standard of proof in this wholly circumstantial evidence case (see, People v Torres, 68 NY2d 677, 678; cf., People v Francis, 79 NY2d 925, 926; People v Giuliano, 65 NY2d 766, 767-768; People v Orta, 184 AD2d 1052, 1053).

The People offered proof at trial that a hospital identification…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. SanchezNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. TorresNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. OrtaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HoraceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. PratherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API