Legal Opinion

Haile v. Peirce

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 10, 1870PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County. The facts of the case are sufficently detailed in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.

The action in this case was brought to recover on the promissory note of the following description, to wit:

$1,000. Baltimore County, August 8th, 1865.

Four months after date, we, the President and Directors of the Dulaney’s Valley and Sweet Air Turnpike Company of Baltimore County, promise to pay to William F. Peirce or order, one thousand dollars, with interest, for value received.

Charles T. Haile, President.

J. N. Henderson, Director.

Joseph G. Dance.

Edward R. Sparks; Seo’y.

The first and second counts of the narr. were for money lent and paid; the third, for the overdue and unpaid promissory…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sumwalt v. RidgelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. Von Schmidt Dredge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Belmont Dairy Co. v. ThrasherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  3. Heffner v. BrownellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. Janes v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  5. Wiers v. TreeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API