Legal Opinion

Holeman v. White

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 28, 2012No. 108,399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARRY JOPLIN, Viee-Chief Judge.

1 1 Appellant, Steve White, seeks review of the trial court's order granting David Hole-man a protective order against White for alleged harassment and threatening emails White sent to Holeman over the course of several months. White alleges three propositions of error on appeal. First, he contends that the victim protection order (VPO) was stale, having not been brought within the proper time-frame allotted under 22 O.S8. Supp.2009 § 60.4(B)(4). Second, he alleges Plaintiff's "harassment" allegations are so subjective with respect to the Plaintiff's feelings of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Curry v. StreaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  5. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sanford v. SanfordCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
  2. BOWERS v. FLICKCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. BOWERS v. FLICKCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
  4. Mayo v. DeckardDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API