Legal Opinion
Williams v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided September 18, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2:12-CV-01308Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RULING
PATRICIA MINALDI, District Judge.
Before the court is a Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 16], filed by the defendant, Union Pacific Railroad (UP). The plaintiff, Clarence Williams, filed a Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 20]. to which the defendant has timely filed a reply [Doc. 23]. For the following reasons, the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED, and all claims against defendant are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This case arises from injuries sustained by the plaintiff on the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tubacex, Inc. v. M/V RisanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- American Family Life Assurance v. Glenda Biles, etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Murray v. EarleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.