Legal Opinion
Faust v. Luke
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided January 28, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIrving S. Aronin, J.
Plaintiffs bring this motion to enter judgment against the defendant alleging the failure of defendant to pay the settlement admittedly made between the parties. This the defendant’s carrier denies, setting forth its contention that payment was made.
Although the afore-mentioned positions appear diametrically opposed, there is no substantial dispute as to the facts. The crux of the matter herein, concerns the issuance of a *954check for $522.25 by defendant’s carrier to a carrier that made medical payments to the plaintiffs and which possessed a right of subrogation for said payments.
Defendant’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Silinsky v. State-Wide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Miller v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Moore v. LeggetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Moore v. LeggetteNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Grynbal v. GrynbalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kozlowski v. Briggs Leasing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1978
- Government Employees Insurance v. HalfpennyNew York Supreme Court · 1980
- Teichman v. Community Hospital of Western SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF ALA. v. BoldingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Hayes v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1979