Legal Opinion

Hayes v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Seymour Boyers, J.

Plaintiff moves by order to show cause to vacate the lien asserted by his insurer, Crum & Forster Insurance Company (hereinafter "Crum & Forster”), against the sum received in a malpractice action.

On February 10, 1975 plaintiff incurred injuries in a motor vehicle accident, which required examination and treatment at Elmhurst General Hospital. As a result of that hospital’s *749alleged misdiagnosis a medical malpractice claim was commenced against the defendant herein and later settled before this court. Crum & Forster thereafter advised the parties of its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scinta v. KazmierczakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Faust v. LukeCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
  2. Doherty v. Barco Auto Leasing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Biette v. BaxterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Travelers Insurance CompaniesNew York Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API