Legal Opinion

Filburn v. Helke

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 14, 1942No. 118PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRUFFEL, District Judge.

The above entitled action was submitted to this three judge court organized undei Section 3 of the Act of August 24, 1937, 28 U.S.C.A. § 380a, after argument, upon the pleadings and agreed stipulation of facts from which it appears that plaintiff is a farmer who has been engaged in producing wheat among other products on a farm in Montgomery County, Ohio. Under the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1281 et seq., a wheat acreage allotment of 11.1 acres and a normal yield of 20.1 bushels an acre were established for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nichols v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Mulford v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Piedmont & N. Ry. Co. v. QueryDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1932
  5. Brucker v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Beckman v. MallDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1942
  3. Filburn v. HelkeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1942
  4. United States v. Rhonda Anne McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Rhonda Anne McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API