Legal Opinion
Filburn v. Helke
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 14, 1942No. 118Published
1Opinion of the Court
43 F.Supp. 1017 (1942)
FILBURN
v.
HELKE et al.
No. 118.
District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.
March 14, 1942.
Webb R. Clark and Harry N. Routzohn, both of Dayton, Ohio, for plaintiff.
Calvin Crawford, U. S. Atty., of Dayton, Ohio, and John S. L. Yost and W. Carroll Hunter, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., for defendants.
Before ALLEN, Circuit Judge, and NEVIN and DRUFFEL, District Judges.
DRUFFEL, District Judge.
The above entitled action was submitted to this three judge court organized under Section 3 of the Act of August 24, 1937, 28 U.S.C.A. § 380a, after argument, upon the pleadings and agreed stipulation…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Nichols v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.