People v. Nelson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
The defendant was charged with perjury alleged to have been committed by testifying to a certain fact in a prior civil action. The court, sitting without a jury, found the defendant guilty and thereafter granted his motion for a new trial, from which order the People have appealed.
It appears from the evidence that one Fred E. Pierce had sued the respondent for some $2,000 for services in making an audit. The respondent claimed an agreement that the work should be done for $250 and that a certain check for $50 was the final payment thereon. At the trial of the civil action he introduced in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. FerlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. KnutteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. Von TiedemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. BihnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. AgnewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. BermúdezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
- In Re LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. BassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.