Legal Opinion

People v. Nelson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1940No. Crim. 392PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The defendant was charged with perjury alleged to have been committed by testifying to a certain fact in a prior civil action. The court, sitting without a jury, found the defendant guilty and thereafter granted his motion for a new trial, from which order the People have appealed.

It appears from the evidence that one Fred E. Pierce had sued the respondent for some $2,000 for services in making an audit. The respondent claimed an agreement that the work should be done for $250 and that a certain check for $50 was the final payment thereon. At the trial of the civil action he introduced in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. FerlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. People v. KnutteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. Von TiedemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. People v. BihnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. AgnewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. BermúdezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  4. In Re LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People v. BassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API