Legal Opinion
In Re Cole
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided August 2, 1988No. 19-10681PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HAL J. BONNEY, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
The debtors, Robert Mark and Katherine Montgomery Cole, contend that Bruce H. Gould, Esquire, Mark Kantro, Esquire, and Leon and Harvey Leach violated the automatic stay which arose upon their filing of a Chapter 13 petition. The Coles seek to hold Gould in contempt for his actions taken as trustee under a deed of trust in completing his transfer of their home in Norfolk. Kantro as counsel for the Leaches, and the Leaches, who purchased the Coles home at the foreclosure sale, are alleged to have violated the stay by filing an action in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blossom v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Burruss v. HinesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Feldman v. RuckerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
- Abdelhaq v. PflugDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mann v. Alexander Dawson Inc. (In re Mann)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Flowers v. Washington Federal Savings Bank (In Re Flowers)District Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- Washington v. County of King William (In Re Washington)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Ex Rel. Countrywide Home Loans v. Wolfe (In Re Wolfe)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2006
- In re UlreyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.