First Nat. Exch. Bank v. Sherman
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Minnehaha county. Hon. J. W. Jones, Judge. Action upon promissory note. Plaintiff had judgment and defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtFuller, J.
Defendants, by their answer, admit the execution, delivery, and nonpayment of the promissory note made the basis of this suit, but deny that plaintiff is the owner and holder thereof. At the trial, certain depositions, taken upon due notice and in regular form, containing evidence material to the issue thus raised, were offered on the part of plaintiff, and received in evidence, over an objection interposed by counsel for the defendants, “for the reason that there is no foundation laid for the introduction of any such evidence, that there is no sufficient certificate or authentication of said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Columbian Insurance Co. of Alexandria v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Caledonia Gold Mining Co. v. NoonanSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1882
- Bright v. EckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. NeiswangerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SextonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Ashe v. George M. Beasley & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Huempfner v. BaillySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. FinderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897